Nothing was logged into or tested. To have this reading and your details deleted, reply to the email it came with or write to [email protected]. Outside Reading Policy
What was publicly visible from outside on 15 October 2026. It does not cover your internal systems.
HIGH Nothing tells mail servers to refuse email forged in your name Verify
- Direct loss
- Mail forged in your name tells a client to pay somewhere new. Reported business email compromise losses averaged roughly $123,000 per complaint in 2025. FBI IC3 2025
- Time lost
- Calling clients to confirm which messages were really yours.
- Response
- Speed matters: in 2025 the FBI froze 58% of the money it tried to stop after a fraud was reported. FBI IC3 2025
Show the proof
;; status: NXDOMAIN (answered by 1.1.1.1): _dmarc.harbourview-law.example does not exist
dig TXT _dmarc.harbourview-law.example +short @1.1.1.1
HIGH 1 domain made from your firm's name was registered on 5 September 2026, is set up to send and receive email and has no website. We cannot tell from outside who owns it. Is it yours?
- Direct loss
- Mail from a near-copy of your domain tells a client to pay somewhere new. Reported business email compromise losses averaged roughly $123,000 per complaint in 2025. FBI IC3 2025
- Time lost
- Calling clients to confirm which messages were really yours.
- Response
- Speed matters: in 2025 the FBI froze 58% of the money it tried to stop after a fraud was reported. FBI IC3 2025
- Direct loss
- If a password was reused on a listed address, someone can open that mailbox and redirect a payment. Reported business email compromise losses averaged roughly $123,000 per complaint in 2025. FBI IC3 2025
- Time lost
- Changing the password on the 3 listed addresses, and anywhere else it was used: roughly 2 to 3 hours. Our estimate, 30 to 60 minutes each.
- Response
- Speed matters: in 2025 the FBI froze 58% of the money it tried to stop after a fraud was reported. FBI IC3 2025
ABA Formal Opinion 477R expects lawyers to make reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized access to client information sent over the internet. What is reasonable is judged case by case, starting with how sensitive the information is. ABA Formal Opinion 477R
ABA Formal Opinion 512 expects lawyers to understand the benefits and risks of the AI tools they use. Attackers use the same kind of tools against firms, and this reading shows what they find. ABA Formal Opinion 512
27 May 2025 · California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, case D083655 (United States): A California appeal court decision published in May 2025 covers a $475,000 settlement payment that went to criminals. They wrote to the paying side's lawyer from a domain one letter different from the other law firm's. The court ordered the paying side to pay again.
On harbourview-law.example: A domain made from your firm's name is registered and set up to send email.
7 Oct 2026 · The Record: Arizona court system. The way in was email made to look like it came from a trusted sender.
On harbourview-law.example: Nothing tells mail servers to refuse email forged in your name.
1 · Technical Evidence and FindingsThe evidence and the exact fixEvery weakness on anything you have online, and which of your addresses are in breach records
2 · Owner Summary and Action BriefFor the ownerEverything that matters, in plain language
3 · Rules and Insurance BriefingPrivacy rules and insurer questionsHow this affects your insurance renewal and the rules you fall under
4 · Assessment RecordDated record, issued by LeakTrace Inc.What was read from outside and what was found, dated
5 · Monitoring, First Month Included. Hourly for email settings, look-alikes and new host names; daily for the rest; same-day alerts
6 · A Fix for Every Finding. In your dashboard, in the order to do them, with the exact change written out
7 · Delivered Inside 72 Hours. Inside 72 hours of confirmation, human-verified first
Yours to keep, whatever you decide
Ten things to do this weekOpen the list ↓
Everything above is about Harbourview Law LLP, the domain and the email addresses attached to it. We did not look at anybody's personal accounts, and we would not. But a firm usually gets hurt through one owner's personal email. So this is the short list we would give a friend. There is nothing to sign up for and most of it takes an evening.
One thing that genuinely has changed: the scam email that used to give itself away with clumsy spelling does not any more. Assume the writing will be perfect and judge the request instead.
- Use an authenticator app rather than text-message codes on your email, your bank and anything holding money. A phone number can be taken from you. An app on the handset cannot.
- Treat your personal email as the master key, because it is. Whoever controls it can reset almost everything else you own. It deserves your strongest password and that password should exist nowhere else.
- Put a port-out PIN on your mobile account. One call to your carrier. It stops somebody talking your number onto their own phone, which is how text-message codes get defeated.
- Get a password manager. The value is not that the passwords are stronger. It is that a breach at one website stops at that website instead of walking into your bank.
- Any request to move money or change bank details gets a phone call on a number you already had, not one from the message. This single habit defeats the most expensive attack aimed at businesses your size.
- Keep the money separate from the everyday. The address on your website and your invoices should not be the address that recovers your bank login.
- Let the phone and the browser update themselves. Most break-ins use a hole that was fixed months earlier on machines that never restarted.
- Keep one backup the computer cannot reach on its own. That means an external drive you unplug, or a service with its own separate login. Ransomware encrypts everything it can see, including the backup drive left plugged in.
- Write down who you would call, today, while nothing is wrong. Your bank's fraud line, your web host, and your insurer. Working that out during an incident is what turns a bad afternoon into a bad month.
Three questions worth asking inside your firm▾
-
When did we last look at this from the outside, without using our own logins?Nearly all monitoring watches the inside of a network. What is on this page is what is reachable without any credentials at all, which is the view an attacker starts from and the one least likely to be covered.
-
Which of these did we already know about, and what was the decision not to change it?Some of it will be deliberate, and a good answer here is a real answer. What matters is whether it was a decision on record or something nobody had looked at.
-
What happens to a forged invoice sent in our name today, and when did we last test that?This is the one that costs money rather than reputation, and the answer is a date and a result, not an opinion. If there is no date, it has not been tested.